NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan

NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan
NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan
In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.

Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.
Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.
Propose strategies that will be taken if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.
Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation. NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan
Refer to the \”Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview\” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Complete the \”APA Writing Checklist\” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Evidence-Based Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan Example Paper
Expected Outcomes.
After implementing the evidence-based project, I anticipate results not differing from other previous pieces of research done on the same project.  I expect nurses to implement the skills and knowledge gained to adhere to daily bathing of the central line with chlorohexidine in ICU patients. As a result, I expect a decrease in the rate of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI).  According to Arunga et al.(2021), reduced CLABSI would decrease hospital stays, reduce the cost of care, improve patient satisfaction, reduce rehospitalization, and improve patient outcomes.
Data collection Tools, Research Design, and Statistical test
This research project adopted a prospective cohort study design, a quantitative design. Nurses will be trained on how to do daily chlorhexidine bathing in ICU patients. Patients will be grouped into cases and control. Patients in the study group will be bathed with chlorhexidine, while those in the control group will receive a normal saline infusion. All standards of care will be observed with the patient’s interests prioritized. Follow-up will be done to determine the rates of CLABSI among the study groups.
Data will be collected using questionnaires, interviews, and laboratory tests, including blood cultures, temperature measurements, and medical health records. I will prefer to use a questionnaire for data collection in this project. Questionnaires are valid, reliable, and applicable in this project as they have been used before with higher success rates (Hammoudeh et al., 2018 NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan). Questionnaires are standardized and hence valid to provide accurate data from the project. In addition, questionnaires are reliable as they can provide the same results if used appropriately in repeated trials. In addition, a questionnaire will address various aspects of the project; hence it is applicable to provide extensive data (Haddadin et al., 2021).  Finally, Questionnaires are preferable because they are cheap to use and can be used to collect extensive data that can easily be analyzed.
After collecting data, a Chi-square test will be used to analyze categorical variables. The Chi-square test is helpful in hypothesis testing while providing an association between variables (McDougle et al., 2020). Furthermore, the probability of dependence between classified variables is applicable while using a chi-square. In this project, chi-square will help determine the relationship between using normal saline or chlorhexidine in reducing the rates of central line infections.
How outcomes will be measured and evaluated
The anticipated outcome of this project is aimed at improving patient outcomes in terms of reducing central line infection through the use of chlorohexidine. Nurses are expected to adhere to the training offered and bathe daily patients with chlorhexidine. Patients will also know the importance of using chlorhexidine in addition to maintaining general hygiene to prevent CLABSI.
Once nurses have mastered the technique of daily bathing, the rate of CLABSI will reduce. As a result, patients will have improved outcomes in terms of reduced hospital stay, reduced cost of care, improved quality of care, reduced readmission rate, and reduction in mortality and morbidity (Frost et al., 2018). Furthermore, there will be reduced exposure of patients to long-term antibiotics, resulting in antibiotic resistance. Healthcare providers will also learn about different monitoring strategies to suspect CLABSI while ordering specific tests to assess patients.  Likewise, the institutional expenditure on caring for patients will reduce, and the cash could be used to improve other patient care sectors (Arunga et al., 2021). Finally, the knowledge gained in this project will be spread by nurses to other institutions that will adopt the same practice. As a result, patient care across the institutions will improve with better patient outcomes.
Strategies to be taken if outcomes do not provide positive results.
I believe the steps I have in this project will yield the expected results. However, if the expected outcomes are not achieved, I will be obliged to review the whole process. Reviewing the process will include assessing the availability of resources and personnel used during the entire process while identifying gaps that would have led to deviation from the expected results. Furthermore, I will gain more insight from the champion nurses regarding the implementation process while gathering views regarding their perception of the evidence-based project. In addition, I will improve on the strategies of training nurses and encouraging them to adhere to the process. Finally, if all the interventions fail to yield the results, I will consider starting the whole process afresh. However, more strategies will be implemented to cover the gaps identified during the initial process.
Plan to maintain, Extend, or Revise, Discontinue a Proposed Solution.
The outcome of the project will determine its fate and application. The project will be maintained and extended in clinical practice if the expected outcomes are achieved. Maintenance and extension will be done through continuous training and educating nurses on daily bathing and its importance (McDougle et al., 2020 NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan). The benefits can be extended to other centers through information sharing and training.
However, if the expected outcomes are not achieved, the project may be revised. The revision will include identifying gaps and improving in those particular areas to increase the efficiency of the project. Nonetheless, if the risks of the intervention outweigh its benefit, the project may be discontinued, and the whole process rewritten and started again. The ultimate goal is to ensure that the project improves clinical outcomes and enhanced decision-making.
NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan References
Arunga, S., Mbarak, T., Ebong, A., Mwesigye, J., Kuguminkiriza, D., Mohamed-Ahmed, A. H. A., Hoffman, J. J., Leck, A., Hu, V., & Burton, M. (2021). Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% as a treatment for recalcitrant fungal keratitis in Uganda: a pilot study. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 6(1), e000698. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000698
Frost, S. A., Hou, Y. C., Lombardo, L., Metcalfe, L., Lynch, J. M., Hunt, L., Alexandrou, E., Brennan, K., Sanchez, D., Aneman, A., & Christensen, M. (2018). Evidence for the effectiveness of chlorhexidine bathing and healthcare-associated infections among adult intensive care patients: a trial sequential meta-analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases, 18(1), 679. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3521-y
Haddadin, Y., Annamaraju, P., & Regunath, H. (2021). Central line associated bloodstream infections. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430891/
Hammoudeh, S., Gadelhaq, W., & Janahi, I. (2018). Prospective cohort studies in medical research. In Cohort Studies in Health Sciences. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76514
McDougle, J., Sabirovic, M., Pietropaoli, S., & Hamilton, K. (2020). The gulf between emergency plans and the resources needed: a global review: -EN- -FR- Le fossé entre les plans d’urgence et les ressources nécessaires: un examen au niveau mondial -ES- El abismo que media entre los planes de emergencia y los recursos necesarios: panorámica mundial. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 39(2), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.39.2.3088

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

Criteria Description

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

5. 5: Excellent
14.4 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided.

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3. 3: Satisfactory
12.67 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are summarized. More information is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.52 points
Some expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are only partially outlined.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are not discussed.

Data Collection Tools

Statistical Test for Project

Criteria Description

Statistical Test for Project

5. 5: Excellent
12 points
A statistical test is selected, and a well-supported explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is clearly presented.

A statistical test is selected, and an explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
A statistical test is selected, and a summary for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. More information or support is needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
A statistical test is selected, but it is unclear why the test is best suited for the tool.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A statistical test is omitted.

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive

Criteria Description

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive

5. 5: Excellent
14.4 points
Clear and well-supported strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented.

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3. 3: Satisfactory
12.67 points
General strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. More information and support are needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.52 points
Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are not discussed.

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution

Criteria Description

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution

5. 5: Excellent
13.2 points
Detailed and well-supported plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented.

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3. 3: Satisfactory
11.62 points
General plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. More information and support are needed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
10.56 points
Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are not discussed.

Required Sources

Criteria Description

Required Sources

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Number of required sources is only partially met.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

All format elements are correct.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10