NRNP 6675 Week 5 Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum

NRNP 6675 Week 5 Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum
NRNP 6675 Week 5 Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum
Assignment: Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum, Other Psychotic, and Medication-Induced Movement Disorders
Psychotic disorders change one’s sense of reality and cause abnormal thinking and perception. Patients presenting with psychotic disorders may suffer from delusions or hallucinations or may display negative symptoms such as lack of emotion or withdraw from social situations or relationships. Symptoms of medication-induced movement disorders can be mild or lethal and can include, for example, tremors, dystonic reactions, or serotonin syndrome.
For this Assignment, you will complete a focused SOAP note for a patient in a case study who has either a schizophrenia spectrum, other psychotic, or medication-induced movement disorder.

To Prepare
Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing, diagnosing, and treating schizophrenia spectrum, other psychotic, and medication-induced movement disorders.
Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media
Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations.
Review the video, Case Study: Sherman Tremaine. You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
The Assignment
Develop a focused SOAP note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, and list them in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Plan: What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? Discuss what your next intervention would be if you were able to follow up with this patient. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention, taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).
SOAP Note: Schizophrenia Spectrum Example Approach
Subjective:
CC (chief complaint):
            Delusions and hallucinations.
HPI:
C.M, a 27-year-old female Hispanic patient comes for a psychiatric evaluation. She was last well about two months ago when she started experiencing delusions and hallucinations. The patient was constantly on the lookout believing that someone was spying on her with the motive of harming her. The patient also started experiencing auditory hallucinations. She claims that she often hears voices of several men and women talking and laughing at her constantly. The delusions and hallucinations have been there for the past two months with no recollection of similar symptoms previously. Over the last month, the patient has reported low energy levels on several occasions and often withdrawing herself from close family members and friends.
Substance Current Use:
The patient denies any alcohol, tobacco, or drug use.
Medical History:
The patient has no known chronic illnesses. No previous surgeries. No prior hospital admissions.

The patient is currently not on any medication.

NKDFA.

LMP 04/06/2022. The cycle is 30 days lasting 5 days. Regular flow. G0T0P0A0L0. No contraceptive. Currently single. The patient is a victim of both physical and sexual assault from a previous relationship.

Family history of schizophrenia. No other known chronic illnesses among close family members.
ROS:

GENERAL: No reports of fever, body aches, or any other concerns.
HEENT: No history of trauma, headache, or falls. No complications related to the throat, nose, and ears.
SKIN: No history of rash, lesions, or concerns with eczema.
CARDIOVASCULAR: No complains of chest pain, no palpitations, no orthopnea.
RESPIRATORY: No chest pain, no cough, no difficulty in breathing.
GASTROINTESTINAL: No change in appetite. No history of abnormal bowel movements.
GENITOURINARY: No hematuria, no dysuria, no urgency, no frequency.
NEUROLOGICAL: No syncope, no dizziness, no blurry vision, no tinnitus.
MUSCULOSKELETAL: No pain in the muscles or joints.
HEMATOLOGIC: No history of easy bruising or bleeding.
LYMPHATICS: Denies any lymph node swelling.
ENDOCRINOLOGIC: Denies increased thirst or urination.

Objective:
VS: Temp: 98.0 F, BP: 99/69, HR: 96, RR: 17, 100% on RA, Height: 5ft, 3in Wt.: 139 lbs.
BMI: 24.6. Lies within the normal range.
General: The patient is not sick looking and is in fair general condition with no signs of respiratory distress.
Skin: No abnormal lesions were observed on the skin.
Head: Normal shape and size.
Eyes: No abnormalities detected. The pupils respond appropriately to stimulation by light.
ENT: No abnormalities were observed on the ears and nose. The tympanic membrane is intact. Hearing is unaffected. The throat looks normal with no signs of inflammation.
Neck: No abnormalities on the neck.
CVS: Apex beat is not displaced. There is a normal heart rate and rhythm. Auscultation reveals normal S1 and S2 sounds with no murmurs.
RS: Trachea is central. Vesicular and bronchial breath sounds were heard. No additional sounds.
Abdomen: No visible scars. No distention. No tenderness or masses were elicited.
Musculoskeletal: Muscle tone and strength intact. Normal range of movement observed.
Assessment:
MSE:
C.M is a 27-year-old Hispanic female patient who comes in for the evaluation. Her appearance and stated age are appropriate. The patient is well responsive throughout the session. Her blouse is buttoned inappropriately. Her hair is quite unkempt. The patient displays no tics or any other abnormal movements. The patient communicates incoherently, responding to questions asked with unrelated responses and at times moving away from the issue at hand to discuss unrelated matters. The patient often repeats what she had said earlier. Her thought is impaired. There is evidence of looseness of association and flight of ideas. Her mood is euthymic, but she demonstrates a blunt affect. Incongruency is noted. Auditory and visual hallucinations are present in this patient. Delusions are present with the patient constantly worried that someone wants to harm her. There are no thoughts of inflicting harm to self or others. Cognitively, she is alert. C.M is appropriately oriented. Her memory is not impaired. Concentration is impaired. Insight is lacking in her current condition. NRNP 6675 Week 5 Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum
Diagnostic Impression:
The primary diagnosis is schizophreniform disorder.
Differential diagnoses are substance-induced schizophrenia and delusional disorder.
Schizophreniform disorder is a psychotic disorder lasting between one to six months. The condition greatly affects an individual’s level of cognition, emotions, and actions. The condition affects both genders, with a peak incidence among women being reported between the ages of 24 to 35 years (Kahn et al., 2018). Patients often present with delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, and diminished energy levels. In most instances, patients are often untidy and unkempt, often withdrawing from close family members and friends. These symptoms align with the patient’s presenting complaints and findings on examination, making this the most probable diagnosis.
The substance-induced psychotic disorder is often associated with the start or cessation of the use of alcohol or other drugs. Patients often present with delusions, hallucinations, impaired speech, impaired mood, and poor general hygiene (Wilson et al., 2018). These findings are similar to the patient’s presenting complaint. She, however, denies any alcohol or drug use. Further laboratory investigations are required to rule out any substance use and confirm what she said. Delusional disorders are mental health conditions where patients experience various delusions of different kinds. In most instances, there is little to no impact on an individual’s well-being, and one may continue functioning normally. In severe instances, psychotic symptoms may ensue. Pertinent positives, in this case, include the history of delusions and hallucinations, disorganized speech, social withdrawal, and a family history of schizophrenia. In addition, mood and affect incongruency and lack of insight are other pertinent positives. Pertinent negatives include no alcohol or drug use, the patient being well oriented and memory being intact.
Case Formulation and Treatment Plan: 
Pharmacological Interventions
Atypical antipsychotics are often used in the management of schizophreniform disorder. These include risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine (Alphs et al., 2022 NRNP 6675 Week 5 Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum).
Nonpharmacologic Interventions
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), psychoeducation, cognitive remediation, social and coping skills, and family interventions are proven nonpharmacologic interventions for the condition (Ganguly et al., 2018).
Alternative Therapies
Alternative therapies that can prove helpful include talk therapy, family therapy, career coaching, and communication and social skills.
Follow-up Parameters
Assessment of the patient should be done monthly. Symptoms should have completely subsided by 6 months.
Rationale For Management
The management plan is to ensure the protection and stabilization of the patient. Minimizing psychosocial complications and enabling the patient to lead a normal life with minimal adverse effects is another critical goal of management.
Health Promotion Activity
Educating the patient on coping with life’s stresses is a critical component of health promotion.
Patient Education Strategy
The best education strategy is dependent on the patient’s literacy level and ability to embrace the use of technology in healthcare.
Reflection
If I were to conduct the session again, I would inquire further into the family history of schizophrenia. Probing further into the drug and substance use history to know if the patient is lying is another thing I would do. In follow-up meetings, I would work on the patient’s communication and social skills. It is essential to take into account confidentiality, conflict of interest, operational challenges, placebo related, exploitation, informed consent, vulnerability, exploitation, and therapeutic misconception (Brown et al., 2020) as key legal/ethical considerations.        
NRNP 6675 Week 5 Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum References
Alphs, L., Brown, B., Turkoz, I., Baker, P., Fu, D. J., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (2022). The Disease Recovery Evaluation and Modification (DREaM) study: Effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate versus oral antipsychotics in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 243, 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2022.02.019
Brown, C., Ruck Keene, A., Hooper, C. R., & O’Brien, A. (2020). Isolation of patients in psychiatric hospitals in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: An ethical, legal, and practical challenge. International Journal Of Law And Psychiatry, 71, 101572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101572
Ganguly, P., Soliman, A., & Moustafa, A. A. (2018). Holistic Management of Schizophrenia Symptoms Using Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Treatment. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00166
Kahn, R. S., Winter van Rossum, I., Leucht, S., McGuire, P., Lewis, S. W., Leboyer, M., Arango, C., Dazzan, P., Drake, R., Heres, S., Díaz-Caneja, C. M., Rujescu, D., Weiser, M., Galderisi, S., Glenthøj, B., Eijkemans, M., Fleischhacker, W. W., Kapur, S., Sommer, I. E., & OPTiMiSE study group (2018). Amisulpride and olanzapine followed by open-label treatment with clozapine in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder (OPTiMiSE): a three-phase switching study. The lancet. Psychiatry, 5(10), 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30252-9
Wilson, L., Szigeti, A., Kearney, A., & Clarke, M. (2018). Clinical characteristics of primary psychotic disorders with concurrent substance abuse and substance-induced psychotic disorders: A systematic review. Schizophrenia Research, 197, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.001
By Day 7 of Week 5
Submit your Focused SOAP Note.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.Grading CriteriaTo access your rubric:
Week 5 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for AuthenticityTo check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5To participate in this Assignment:
Week 5 Assignment
What’s Coming Up in Week 6?
Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
In Week 6, you will consider sexual and gender identity disorders, such as gender dysphoria and sexual dysfunction. Additionally, next week you will complete your midterm exam.
Next WeekTo go to the next week:
Week 6 Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric\’s layout.
Name: NRNP_6675_Week5_Assignment_RubricGrid ViewList ViewExcellent
90%–100% Good
80%–89% Fair
70%–79% Poor
0%–69%Create documentation in the Focused SOAP Note Template about your assigned patient.
In the Subjective section, provide:• Chief complaint
• History of present illness (HPI)
• Past psychiatric history
• Medication trials and current medications
• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis
• Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history
• Allergies
• ROS
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response throughly and accurately describes the patient\’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.12 (12%) – 13 (13%)The response accurately describes the patient\’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.11 (11%) – 11 (11%)The response describes the patient\’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis but is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. NRNP 6675 Week 5 Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient\’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or the subjective documentation is missing.In the Objective section, provide:• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history
• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient\’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented.12 (12%) – 13 (13%)The response accurately documents the patient\’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented.11 (11%) – 11 (11%)Documentation of the patient\’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor innacuracies.0 (0%) – 10 (10%)The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient\’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed. Or the objective documentation is missing.In the Assessment section, provide:• Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form
• At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)The response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.
Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected.16 (16%) – 17 (17%)The response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.
Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected.14 (14%) – 15 (15%)The response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or innacuracy.
Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.0 (0%) – 13 (13%)The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or the assessment documentation is missing.In the Plan section, provide:• Your plan for psychotherapy
• Your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies. Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.
• Incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.
The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. A strong rationale for the plan is provided that demonstrates critical thinking and content understanding. NRNP 6675 Week 5 Focused SOAP Note for Schizophrenia Spectrum
The response includes at least one evidence-based health promotion activity and one evidence-based patient education strategy.20 (20%) – 22 (22%)The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.
The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. An adequate rationale for the plan is provided.
The response includes at least one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.18 (18%) – 19 (19%)The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.
The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is weak or general.
The response includes one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy, but it may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.0 (0%) – 17 (17%)The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.
The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is inaccurate or missing.
The health promotion and patient education strategies are incomplete or missing.• Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention that takes into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking.4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Reflections demonstrate critical thinking.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking.0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).9 (9%) – 10 (10%)The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.8 (8%) – 8 (8%)The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study.7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Three evidence-based resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Two or fewer resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based.Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understandingWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains 1-2 APA format errors3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains 3-4 APA format errors0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains five or more APA format errorsTotal Points: 100Name: NRNP_6675_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10