NRNP 6675 Week 2 Study Plan Reflection

NRNP 6675 Week 2 Study Plan Reflection
NRNP 6675 Week 2 Study Plan Reflection
Assignment 2: Study Plan
Photo Credit: [Jacob Ammentorp Lund]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
Can you imagine an athlete deciding to run a marathon without training for the event? Most ambitious people who have set this goal will follow a specific training plan that will allow them to feel confident and prepared on the big day. Similarly, if you want to feel confident and prepared for your certification exam, you should create and follow a plan that will thoroughly prepare you for success.
In this Assignment, you will review the study plan that you developed in NRNP 6665, and revise your plan as necessary, which will serve as the road map for you to follow to attain your certification.

To Prepare
Reflect on the study plan you created in NRNP 6665. Did you accomplish your SMART goals? What areas of focus still present opportunities for growth?
The Assignment
Revise your study plan summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.
Develop 3–4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.
Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.
By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your study plan.
Submission and Grading Information
Study Plan Reflection Sample
Learning and teaching require some level of organization. When learning is organized, the human mind comprehends information more effectively. The level of organization may necessitate the development of a study plan and the arrangement of topics in order, with time frames assigned to them to achieve the goal. A study plan, according to Kivimäki and Meriluoto (2018), is a chart or a schedule that allows a person to block out the time needed to achieve goals or complete a set of well-defined learning activities. Find below a reflection of a study plan on intellectual disability, which was created in the previous assignment.
Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement
When a weakness in a subject is identified, developing a study plan is the most effective way to maximize one’s learning in that subject. The study plan’s strength, in this case, is that it is individualized, with objectives aimed at assisting one in an area of weakness. The study plan takes into account the fact that each individual is unique, with specific strengths and weaknesses that must be addressed (Aftoni et al., 2021). Another strength of the study plan is its comprehensiveness – it includes almost all of the relevant and necessary topics on intellectual disability that are within the scope of the student’s learning. Furthermore, the study plan was designed in a simple manner to facilitate reading and learning. There are numerous resources, but there is simply not enough time to study them all. The study plan ensures that one learns using the best resources and maximizes learning time (Aftoni et al., 2021; Siagian et al., 2019). Despite the study plan’s strengths, I noticed that the time frame for completing each learning activity was not considered, necessitating room for improvement. To improve the efficiency of my next study plan, I would include the time I intend to devote to each learning activity.
Were the SMART Goals Achieved?
Each of the topics listed under intellectual disability in the study plan formed part of the SMART goals. In the case of the DSM V diagnostic criteria for intellectual disability, for example, the SMART goal was to learn the DSM V diagnostic criteria for intellectual disability within the first 30 minutes of the first lesson. The SMART goals were met for all of the topics listed in the study plan. However, there are still areas where there is room for improvement. The areas include the condition’s prevalence, the degrees of intellectual disability, and the inclusion of comprehensive questions at the end of the study plan to confirm comprehension of the topic. The omitted areas are tabulated below as the new SMART goals.
New SMART Goals and Tasks to Complete Each Goal

Intention
What do you want to achieve?
Specific
Who?
What?
Why?
Where?
When?
Measurable
How much?
How often?
How many?
Attainable
Achievable?
Relevant
Is it relevant to your ultimate vision?
Time-bound
When?

Learn the degrees of intellectual disability
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Profound
Intelligence quotient (IQ) for each degree
Mild: 50-69 IQ
Moderate: 35-49 IQ
Severe:20-34 IQ
Profound: <20
Yes
Relevant to practicing as a nurse/doctor/psychologist
June 13th, 2022. First 30 minutes of the next lesson

Learn the prevalence of Intellectual disability
Global prevalence
U.S prevalence
Answer questions on this topic at the end of the lesson to gauge understanding
Resources needed to attain the goal: DSM V, scholarly peer-reviewed articles, and course textbook.
The goal is worthwhile for me as a nurse student.
June 13th, 2022, is the second part of the lesson. It will take 15 minutes.

Learn the role of a psychiatrist in the management of intellectual disability
Pharmacology
Non-pharmacology
At the end of the lesson, answer questions on this topic
Resources: Scholarly peer-reviewed articles, course textbook
Information relevant to me as a nurse student
June 14th, the first 20 minutes of the lesson

 
Measuring progress is an important aspect of learning. At the end of the lessons, I will answer comprehension questions about my SMART goals to assess my understanding. Each of the three new areas will have five questions, for a total of fifteen. Thereafter, I will use the following scale: 1-5 (poor understanding), 6-10 (good understanding), and 11-15 (excellent understanding). I will be able to identify my strengths and weaknesses as well as areas for improvement by answering the questions.
Resources to Accomplish Goals
The entire course necessitates the use of various study resources. I plan to join an existing study group or form a new one with my friends. We will meet regularly to discuss our learning activities. According to Chang, 2019), study groups encourage members to think creatively and develop strong communication skills, which improve their understanding. Aside from the study group, I will review the course materials, including the textbooks and articles, to better understand the subject. In my previous assignment, I used the acronym MMASSCCC to describe the various diagnoses of intellectual disability. Mnemonics will be used as part of my strategy for easy learning in my next outline. My learning resources will also include reliable online sources and databases for nursing and medical knowledge. Google Scholar, PROQUEST, and MEDLINE are a few examples. The sources provide meaningful research papers from which accurate conclusions can be drawn based on professionally executed experimentation (Horvath, 2018). Multiple resources must be obviously used to achieve a maximum understanding of a subject.
NRNP 6675 Week 2 Study Plan Reflection References
Aftoni, A., Susila, I. W., Sutiadiningsih, A., & Hidayatulloh, M. K. Y. (2021). Plan-Do-Review-Share-Happy (Plandoresh) strategy as an effort of developing vocational high school students’ independent learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i1.37165
Chang, B. (2019). Reflection in Learning. Online Learning, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1447
Horvath, A. O. (2018). Research on the alliance: Knowledge in search of a theory. Psychotherapy Research: Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 28(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1373204
Kivimäki, V., & Meriluoto, S. (2018). Holistic perspective to Individual Study Plan: Personal Development Project Plan. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 256, 514–526. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-923-2-514
Siagian, M. V., Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of learning materials oriented on problem-based learning model to improve students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and metacognition ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5717
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.Click the Week 2 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.Click the Week 2 Assignment 2 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 2 Assignment 2 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for AuthenticityTo check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 2 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2To participate in this Assignment:
Week 2 Assignment 2
What’s Coming Up in Module 2?
Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
In Module 2, you will practice assessing, diagnosing, and formulating treatment plans for various mental health disorders across the lifespan. You will also explore controversies and treatment issues related to certain disorders. Disorders not covered in NRNP 6665 will be covered in this course. You will complete your midterm exam in Week 6.
Name: NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_Rubric
Grid ViewList ViewExcellent
90%–100% Good
80%–89% Fair
70%–79% Poor
0%–69%Revise your study plan, summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement.23 (23%) – 25 (25%)The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.20 (20%) – 22 (22%)The response provides an accurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.18 (18%) – 19 (19%)The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of both current strengths and opportunities for improvement.0 (0%) – 17 (17%)A summary of both the current strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing.Develop 3-4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.27 (27%) – 30 (30%)The response provides 3-4 new clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured.24 (24%) – 26 (26%)The response provides 3-4 new appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided.21 (21%) – 23 (23%)The response provides 3-4 somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate.0 (0%) – 20 (20%)The response provides 3-4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing.Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.27 (27%) – 30 (30%)The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need.24 (24%) – 26 (26%)The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need.21 (21%) – 23 (23%)The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need.0 (0%) – 20 (20%)The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. NRNP 6675 Week 2 Study Plan Reflection
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time.
Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understandingWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains 1-2 APA format errors3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains 3-4 APA format errors0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains five or more APA format errorsTotal Points: 100Name: NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_Rubric
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10