Re:Topic 4 DQ 2 Determining the level of evidence –
Re:Topic 4 DQ 2 Determining the level of evidence
Re:Topic 4 DQ 2 Determining the level of evidence
Determining the level of evidence is a key component of appraising the evidence. This provides guidance in the type of research that are more likely to provide answers to a specific clinical question. Also, it can help us change clinical practice, or apply the clinical practice to the patient population. Peterson, M. & et all in an article published reported that there are multiple levels of evidence such as:
1. Meta-analysis of multiple controlled studies with results that consistently support a specific action, intervention, or treatment (systematic review of a randomized controlled trial).
2. Evidence from well-designed controlled studies, both randomized and nonrandomized, with results that consistently support a specific action, intervention, or treatment
3. Evidence from qualitative, integrative reviews, or systematic reviews of qualitative, descriptive, or correlational studies or randomized controlled trials with inconsistent results
4. Evidence from peer-reviewed professional organizational standards, with clinical studies to support recommendations
5. Theory-based evidence from expert opinion or multiple case reports
The best resources are enumerated from the strongest level of evidence in number one to the weakest level of evidence in number 5.
For example: Meta-analyses studies or systematic reviews are quantitative rigorous types of reviews. Which provide a quantitative estimate of how well a treatment works, or provide an estimate of how likely a person is to develop a disease and it produces more confidence for us to base our clinical decision. On the other hand, if you ask a cardiologist about a certain thing, his answer can contradict the books or other expert opinions. His opinion is based on his experience, not on other studies and it is the lowest trustworthy level of evidence. Furthermore, in qualitative research we find the essence of an experience and the sample is small so it is very difficult to be generalized.
In a nutshell, when we looking at a research we have to know what type of evidence it can provide and how trustworthy the evidence can be.
Hide
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10